SmartPassengers.org.au SmartPassengers.org.au

News

January 2012: New Statement of Purposes

September 2011: Call for Light Rail to Rowville

March 2011: Newsletter available for download

July 2010: Transport policies updated and expanded

June 2010: Further detail relating to the book "Transport Plan - An Alternative Option" published

May 2010: Book "Transport Plan - An Alternative Option" available for sale

January 2010: Submissions for 2010-2020 plan are now closed. Published copies will be available shortly.

December 2009: Draft of 2010-2020 plan available for comments, see Policies page.

December 2009: Annual General Meeting coming up on 13 December, including launch of our upcoming book. Email for details.

October 2008: Calls for new local spokespeople!

September 2008: Members' meeting coming soon - see forum for details

June 2008: Forum online

May 2008: Transport policies now available

Dec 2007: Memberships now open. Download a form and join today!

Policy: Funding public transport improvements

In our Australian society we believe that the people who receive the benefit of any measure should be the ones who pay for it. Who receives the benefit from improvements in public transport?

  1. Commuters will benefit. However, fare revenue could not yield enough money to pay for major investments to the system as ticket prices would be forbiddingly high.
  2. The environment will benefit. Public transport causes a lot less pollution per passenger-kilometer than private cars, especially when you include the secondary effects of driving (eg transporting the fuel from the refinery to the petrol station). The environment doesn't have money of its own, but all levels of government have programs to help build an environmentally sustainable society. Public transport investment is a valid use of that money.
  3. Motorists will benefit. Roads will be less congested because more people will take public transport, so a small tax on petrol is justifiable. This will also act as a deterrent tax, to alert people to the environmental consequences of driving.
  4. The people of the future will benefit. Lack of investment now will lead to gridlocks which will cost Melbourne dearly over the next few decades. Therefore it's right for the government to borrow money to build infrastructure, because then the next generation, which will be reaping the benefits, will also pay the bills (via their taxes).

Federal funding

Some people have called for the Federal government to contribute to the funding of public transport. Smart Passengers sees this as potentially very beneficial, but also potentially dangerous. Unless strict guidelines are made as to which level of government is responsible for which improvements, they could both end up investing very little and hoping the other will do it instead.

We might (for instance) continue to have the state government responsible for operating costs plus all improvements to existing infrastructure, and bring in Federal money for the construction of new lines (such as to Doncaster and Rowville).

According to the Australian Constitution, the Federal government has the responsibility - up to the point of being able to override state government decisions - over certain specific areas including environmental matters. The provision of a high capacity public transport corridoor into a highly populated area of Melbourne which is currently served only very poorly is a prime candidate for this responsibility to be exercised.